I would never hire a guy who would not tell me what he would do in a certain situation. But, somehow this has become part of the culture of subterfuge in our legal system.
Even more amazing than this, is that the American people accept these shenanigans. They would never accept an answer like that in any other situation.
The Supreme Court Justice hearings have been showcasing a man of politics who is afraid to state his convictions for the sake of "impartiality". Unfortunately, impartiality does not exist in the marketplace of ideas. Judge Roberts does not even the moral fiber to say that he believes in anything that matters for fear of how it might affect him politically and professionally.
Species Identification: "Spineless Mamilian Evangellyfish"
Here is what he sounds like to me... by Matt (bubba) Chancey:
"Judge John Roberts vs. Bubba Gump Atkins
NEWSFLASH: President Bush appoints Bubba Gump Atkins from Red Level, Alabama, as the replacement for Justice O’Connor. The following is the “unofficial” transcript of Judge Roberts’ and Bubba’s answers to the same questions as put to them by the Senate Judiciary Committee…1. Senator Specter: Does human life begin at conception?
Judge Roberts: Senator, that’s dealing with a subject that might end up as a case before me, so I’m afraid I can’t comment on that because it would not be right for me to say how I would rule on the matter at this time. I can say that I will consider this subject with an open mind, taking into consideration past precedent, as well as the impact it would have if the Court departed from stare decisis in this matter.
Bubba: Hey, man, if it ain’t a baby, yor ol’ lady ain’t pregnant!
2. Senator Kohl: Do you think it’s a good idea for people to have the right to criticize the Bush administration’s policy on Iraq?
Judge Roberts: Senator, that’s dealing with a subject that might end up as a case before me, so I’m afraid I can’t comment on that because it would not be right for me to say how I would rule on the matter at this time. I can say that I will consider this subject with an open mind, taking into consideration past precedent, as well as the impact it would have if the Court departed from stare decisis in this matter.
Bubba: Why shore, I reckon.
3. Senator Feingold: In your opinion, do mature adults have a constitutional right to marry their pets?
Judge Roberts: Senator, that’s dealing with a subject that might end up as a case before me, so I’m afraid I can’t comment on that because it would not be right for me to say how I would rule on the matter at this time. I can say that I will consider this subject with an open mind, taking into consideration past precedent, as well as the impact it would have if the Court departed from stare decisis in this matter.
Bubba: Senator, yor just plain sick.
4. Senator Schumer: In your personal opinion, do you believe the age of consent should be lowered to 4?
Judge Roberts: Senator, that’s dealing with a subject that might end up as a case before me, so I’m afraid I can’t comment on that because it would not be right for me to say how I would rule on the matter at this time. I can say that I will consider this subject with an open mind, taking into consideration past precedent, as well as the impact it would have if the Court departed from stare decisis in this matter.
Bubba: Well, Momma got married at 14, but I think yor push’n yor luck, Senator!
5. Senator Biden: Does 2 + 2 = 4?
Judge Roberts: Senator, that’s dealing with a subject that might end up as a case before me, so I’m afraid I can’t comment on that because it would not be right for me to say how I would rule on the matter at this time. I can say that I will consider this subject with an open mind, taking into consideration past precedent, as well as the impact it would have if the Court departed from stare decisis in this matter.
Bubba: Why, o’course. Any idjot knows that!
6. Senator Kennedy: Is the sky blue?
Judge Roberts: Senator, that’s dealing with a subject that might end up as a case before me, so I’m afraid I can’t comment on that because it would not be right for me to say how I would rule on the matter at this time. I can say that I will consider this subject with an open mind, taking into consideration past precedent, as well as the impact it would have if the Court departed from stare decisis in this matter.
Bubba: Are you serious? Wut do they put in the wudder up here?
7. Senator Feinstein: Do you agree with me that a woman has a constitutional right to abort her child up to 6 weeks after birth if she decides she doesn’t want to be a mother?
Judge Roberts: Senator, that’s dealing with a subject that might end up as a case before me, so I’m afraid I can’t comment on that because it would not be right for me to say how I would rule on the matter at this time. I can say that I will consider this subject with an open mind, taking into consideration past precedent, as well as the impact it would have if the Court departed from stare decisis in this matter.
Bubba: Alright, that duz it. Whar’s my gun?!"